Program Review Report Template

Process

Schedule of Program Reviews:  All academic programs will be reviewed every five years beginning in fall 2008.  Reviews will usually be based on five years of data and never less than three years for newer programs or programs that have undergone substantial change.  Each program administrator and faculty will participate in preparing a program self-study in the spring prior to the program review. For programs who participate in external accreditation, the information gathered and the findings of external consultant evaluator will be utilized and reframed to fit the program review format and criteria. If additional data are needed beyond that provided by the accreditation process and findings, the program will provided these data.  All other programs will employ external evaluators who will both review programs self-studies and do an on-site visit prior to preparing their report and findings.

                                              Self-Study Template

School, Division, Department:

 

  

Program Review Report Template

Process

Schedule of Program Reviews:  All academic programs will be reviewed every five years beginning in fall 2008.  Reviews will usually be based on five years of data and never less than three years for newer programs or programs that have undergone substantial change.  Each program administrator and faculty will participate in preparing a program self-study in the spring prior to the program review. For programs who participate in external accreditation, the information gathered and the findings of external consultant evaluator will be utilized and reframed to fit the program review format and criteria. If additional data are needed beyond that provided by the accreditation process and findings, the program will provided these data.  All other programs will employ external evaluators who will both review programs self-studies and do an on-site visit prior to preparing their report and findings.

                                              Self-Study Template

School, Division, Department:

 

 

 

 

     Table l. Internal Demand

 

Spring 05

Fall 05

Spring 06

Fall 06

Spring 07

Fall 07

New majors

           

Total number of majors

           
 
Describe the resources generated and used by the program and key results of the uses of these resources in the areas of student retention, graduation rates, and number of degrees awarded, and services provided to non-majors and to campus-wide learning goals.
1. List grants and contracts received by the program in the last three years and indicate how these resources have affected program productivity and efficiency.

      Table 2.

Fiscal

Year

Type of Resource

Approximate Dollar Amount

2005

   

2006

   

2007

   

 

 

Table 3.

Fiscal

Year

Type of Resource

Approximate Dollar Amount

2005

   

2006

   

2007

   

 

      Table 4.

Year

Fall to fall retention rate

Number of low enrolled classes

Number of cancelled classes

Number of graduates

Graduation rate

2005

         

2006

         

2007

         
 

      Table 5.  Credit Hour and FTE Productivity by Majors

 

SP

03

F

03

Sp

04

F

04

Sp

05

F 05

Sp

06

F 06

Sp

 07

F 07

Student Credit Hours

                   

l00-200 credit hours

                   

300-400 credit hours

                   

Total credit hours

                   
 
 

       Table 6.  Non-Major Credit Hour Productivity

 

SP

03

F

03

Sp

04

F

04

Sp

05

F 05

Sp

06

F 06

Sp

 07

F 07

l00-200 credit hours

                   

300-400 credit hours

                   

Total credit hours

                   
 

Table 7.  Faculty FTE Productivity Based on Total Major and Non-Major Credit     Hours

 

SP

03

F

03

Sp

04

F

04

Sp

05

F 05

Sp

06

F 06

Sp

 07

F 07

Credit hours per FTE

                   
 

Provide information relating to other areas in which the major has contributed to Campus-wide initiatives in the areas of learning, engagement, diversity, and others not already reported in a previous section of this report.  These might include but are not limited to involvement in freshmen learning communities, Campus-community partnerships and collaborations, and Camp diversity initiatives. Please provide specifics regarding the number of individuals involved in each initiative, the duration of the involvement, as well as the impact of the initiative on the Campus.

 

Describe activities of the program that lead to high program quality and provide documentation of how that quality is measured.

 

Table 8.  Faculty Extramural Research Awards:

Year

Number

Amount

2003

   

2004

   

2005

   

2006

   

2007

   

 Table 9.  Faculty Scholarly Publications (insert number)

Year

Books

Chapters

Ref Journal Articles/Creative Work

Ref/Invited Presentations

2003

       

2004

       

2005

       

2006

       

2007

       

Table 10.  Faculty Service and Engagement

Year

Campus

Discipline

University

Region, Community, State

2003

       

2004

       

2005

       

2006

       

2007

       

 Summarize special accomplishments:

 

 

Describe the relationship between current resources and program capacity. Support your responses with substantive explanations and forecasts based on measurable trends and other data.

 

Additional Information

Please provide information below about any special considerations that contribute to the program’s importance to the campus or that affect the program that has not been covered above.

 

 

In addition to commenting on each criterion, external reviewers are asked to fill in the grid below, providing a summative judgment on the overall success of the program on each criterion.

Table 10.  External Reviewer Feedback

Criterion

Yes

No

Does the program demonstrate significant

alignment with campus Mission, Values, and Strategic Plans?

   

Does the program demonstrate substantial internal demand?

   

Does the program demonstrate substantial external demand?

   

Compared to other similar programs at similar institutions, is it of high quality?

   

Does the program demonstrate significant overall productivity?

   

Do program trends suggest potential for future program growth?

   

Did the additional information provided suggest that the program demonstrates significant contributions to the Campus, region?